AI Stole My Job

Will AI replace Emergency Medicine Physicians?

Estimated risk score: 37 out of 100

Lower replacement risk

Estimate from published task research, not reviewed by a person · how we estimate

Within about 19 points for 4 in 5 of the jobs we checked (18 to 56).

For the occupation as a whole, from ratings of its 17 O*NET tasks published in 2023 and calibrated to our hand scores. A specialty inside it can sit higher or lower.

O*NET-SOC 29-1214.00 · Healthcare Practitioners and Technical

Tasks rated in 2023 as ones AI could do or speed up

Tasks a GPT-4-class model could do, or do in half the time or less: 1 of its 17 rated tasks. In O*NET’s words.

  1. Collect and record patient information, such as medical history or examination results, in electronic or handwritten medical records.

Tasks rated in 2023 as not sped up by AI

Tasks such a model was rated as not speeding up or taking over: 3 of its 17 rated tasks. In O*NET’s words.

  1. Perform emergency resuscitations on patients.
  2. Perform such medical procedures as emergent cricothyrotomy, endotracheal intubation, and emergency thoracotomy.
  3. Stabilize patients in critical condition.

What the job is

Make immediate medical decisions and act to prevent death or further disability. Provide immediate recognition, evaluation, care, stabilization, and disposition of patients. May direct emergency medical staff in an emergency department.

Also called: Emergency Physician, Attending Emergency Physician, ED Doctor, ER Doctor, ED Physician, Emergency MD, ER Physician, Emergency Doctor.

Closest jobs we score by hand

In the same field (Healthcare Practitioners and Technical). Different jobs, each scored by a person.

Source. This site includes information from the O*NET 30.1 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Used under the CC BY 4.0 license. O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications. (O*NET, CC BY 4.0.) Task ratings: Eloundou, Manning, Mishkin and Rock (2023), “GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models”, data used under the MIT licence (licence texts). Our change: we averaged the ratings over this occupation’s tasks and calibrated them to our 0–100 scale. It is not a prediction about any one person and not career advice. Disagree? Write to hello@yourstopwashit.com. How we estimate